Posted by Brian Sorgatz at 3:10 PM

Will left this comment at January 16, 2006 9:12 PM
But now, Jackson deserves to be honored in the same way and for the same reasons as any pioneering black athlete or entertainer. Do you not agree?
I'm not so sure about that... Jackie Robinson and Bill Russell immediately stand out to me as sports pioneers who are more impressive for their skill, the hardships in overcoming racism, and the depth of their character. Sindey Poitier and Spike Lee, I would also argue, have had a much deeper impact on our society-at-large due to the large audiences they've reached and the following public discourse of their actions. Believe it or not, but Jennifer Jackson is not commonly highlighted by the media for her pioneering efforts and isn't viewed by most as a hero.
Black athletes know who Jackie Robinson and Bill Russell are... do you think most black Playmates, porn stars, etcetera view Jennifer Jackson in that same light?
I can't see how Jennifer Jackson could be honored in the same way... or how it could be done meaningfully.
Brian Sorgatz left this comment at January 17, 2006 5:37 PM
Will,
The power to change public discourse is not necessarily the issue here. Did Robinson’s admission into major-league baseball cause a change in public discourse, or was it the other way around? Which came first, the chicken or the egg? In my opinion, one can merit honor for being the sign of positive change as well as for being its agent.
I can't see how Jennifer Jackson could be honored in the same way... or how it could be done meaningfully.
With all due modesty, I think this blog post of mine is a good start.

« Home