Site Meter Reflections on Playboy: Ashley Dupré and Kim Kardashian: the prerogative of regret

May 4, 2010

Ashley Dupré and Kim Kardashian: the prerogative of regret

This post is meant as a companion piece to “Rachel McAdams: the prerogative of boldness, the prerogative of shyness.” In Ashley Dupré and Kim Kardashian, we respectively see one woman moving towards Playboy and another moving away from it, each in so doing expressing regret for a past choice. It’s all good.

Counterintuitively, it is indeed possible and advantageous to separate empathy from morality. (Steven Pinker calls Homo sapiens “the sanctimonious animal.” Moral order is necessary, yet our moral sense is often our own worst enemy.) This separation makes it easier to appreciate the nuances of human drama in celebrity gossip. “Yeah, I was an escort,” says Ashley Dupré. “As much as I wish I could make that go away, I can’t. I’m trying to take it as a lesson learned. I am not proud of what I’ve done.” Her interviewer, Christopher Napolitano, calls Playboy a place “where she can establish herself as sexual without shame, a girl who made mistakes but who nonetheless has the smarts and depth to win you over.” Meanwhile, Kim Kardashian has made more or less the opposite judgment in hindsight about her December 2007 Playboy pictorial. “I’m sorry I did Playboy. I was uncomfortable,” she told Harper’s Bazaar—for which magazine’s May issue she did a nude photo shoot that “felt really empowering” (see below). Whatever Playboy symbolizes for a given woman at a given time, the drama doesn’t fail to fascinate. It’s all good.

Hugh Hefner openly doubts that Playboy has seen the last of Kardashian. Photographer Stephen Wayda recalls that Kardashian was more relaxed and spontaneous than Dupré in front of Playboy’s cameras. Be that as it may, I’m not too proud to let a woman contradict herself. It’s all good.


Posted by Brian Sorgatz at 3:47 PM

Post a Comment

« Home

Create a Link