Site Meter Reflections on Playboy: Hypothetically, Ashley Graham could take revenge by posing for <i>Playboy</i>. I’m just saying.

May 1, 2010

Hypothetically, Ashley Graham could take revenge by posing for Playboy. I’m just saying.


It’s not clear whether the ABC and Fox networks discriminated against the above commercial because of plus-size model Ashley Graham’s physique, or clothing retailer Lane Bryant made the accusation last month as a publicity stunt. Did ABC and Fox treat the ad differently from equally sensual images of skinny Victoria’s Secret models, or is Lane Bryant cynically trying to position itself as the politically correct but sexy champion of “what real women look like”?

In any case, this kind of ad campaign doesn’t deserve much hype for celebrating “real women” and helping them feel included. For every woman who feels better about herself after seeing Ashley Graham’s thick waist, some other woman might feel worse after seeing her smooth skin, well-formed face, vibrant hair, large breasts, long legs, or whatever. The campaign may be relatively “inclusive” in a contrived, statistical sense, but it’s no less Social Darwinist in its basic sense of beauty. The Mozart-versus-Salieri kinds of issues it raises will always be with us.

Naturally, I’ll play along with Lane Bryant’s game of righteous outrage—if it can help talk Ashley Graham into a Playboy pictorial. All politics aside, I’ll invoke the aesthetic principle that a varied repertoire of taste in anything, including female bodies, is good connoisseurship. If some (not all) of the magazine’s models were shaped like her, many of us guys would appreciate the variety. Won’t somebody tell her she needs to do it for the sake of curvy women everywhere?

Posted by Brian Sorgatz at 2:58 PM

Post a Comment

« Home

Create a Link